Appleinfo: Re: [apple-iphone] New Hardware

dimanche 28 octobre 2012

Re: [apple-iphone] New Hardware

You are so right Bill. $299 would have been the "sweet spot" unlike the $249 I quoted earlier. Although, $249 would have been a great price too.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 28, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Bill Boulware <bill.boulware@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree, it should have been $299 max for WiFi model. Not to mention they
> are rapidly approaching way too many SKUs - they have 54 possible iPads
> (mini or regular, black or white, WiFi, AT&T, Verizon, or Sprint, 16, 32,
> or 64GB = 2 x 2 x 4 x 3 = 48 and 6 options for iPad 2 (White or Black,
> WiFi, AT&T, or Verizon all 16GB
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Alice <whiterabbit32@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For the size, I think Apple missed the "sweet spot" price. $329 is too
> > much. I would say $249 would have been a better price. We all know Apple
> > has higher prices for good reason but not having a retina display makes the
> > price a bit expensive, IMHO.
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm disappointed in the iPad mini. Why did they leave off the retina
> > display and price it so high? I can see paying $349 if it were retina but
> > since its not, I can't justify the price since I have an iPad 3.
> > > > White Rabbit
> > >
> > > It costs $170 less than the iPad 2 did when it was released, and has the
> > same pixel resolution, faster connectivity, and (I think) better cameras.
> > >
> > > What's not to like?
> > >
> > > --
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]