I agree, it should have been $299 max for WiFi model. Not to mention they
are rapidly approaching way too many SKUs - they have 54 possible iPads
(mini or regular, black or white, WiFi, AT&T, Verizon, or Sprint, 16, 32,
or 64GB = 2 x 2 x 4 x 3 = 48 and 6 options for iPad 2 (White or Black,
WiFi, AT&T, or Verizon all 16GB
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Alice <whiterabbit32@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the size, I think Apple missed the "sweet spot" price. $329 is too
> much. I would say $249 would have been a better price. We all know Apple
> has higher prices for good reason but not having a retina display makes the
> price a bit expensive, IMHO.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:
>
> > > I'm disappointed in the iPad mini. Why did they leave off the retina
> display and price it so high? I can see paying $349 if it were retina but
> since its not, I can't justify the price since I have an iPad 3.
> > > White Rabbit
> >
> > It costs $170 less than the iPad 2 did when it was released, and has the
> same pixel resolution, faster connectivity, and (I think) better cameras.
> >
> > What's not to like?
> >
> > --
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (41) |
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire