For the size, I think Apple missed the "sweet spot" price. $329 is too much. I would say $249 would have been a better price. We all know Apple has higher prices for good reason but not having a retina display makes the price a bit expensive, IMHO.
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:
> > I'm disappointed in the iPad mini. Why did they leave off the retina display and price it so high? I can see paying $349 if it were retina but since its not, I can't justify the price since I have an iPad 3.
> > White Rabbit
>
> It costs $170 less than the iPad 2 did when it was released, and has the same pixel resolution, faster connectivity, and (I think) better cameras.
>
> What's not to like?
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (40) |
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire