Appleinfo: [apple-iphone] Review roundup: iPad mini and fourth-gen iPad reviews hit the web

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~3/MaGA5C4VaqQ/

Sent to you by Bill Boulware via Google Reader: Review roundup: iPad
mini and fourth-gen iPad reviews hit the web via 9to5Mac by Jake Smith
on 10/30/12

Ahead of the iPad Mini and fourth-generation iPad becoming available to
customers Friday, early reviews of both devices have hit the web. You
can see in the collection below that the reviews are fairly positive,
discussing how great the build quality is, the lightness of the tablet,
and how well it fits in your hand. Starting with the iPad mini:

The Loop:

I use my iPad mini for tasks rather than watching videos or playing
games, but I use it a lot. This is a Wi-Fi model, which was on all the
time and I have yet to see anything cause a significant drain on the
battery. The battery is lasting days for me and it is on 24/7.

Engadget:

In fact we found the brightness and color reproduction to be improved
over the iPad 2, comparable to the latest Retina displays. Colors are
very pleasing to the eye and viewing angles, as ever with an Apple
display, do not disappoint. You can line up as many friends as you like
and sit them shoulder-to-shoulder, they'll all have a bright, clear
picture. Yes, mini owners may have to make do with some resolution
envy, but they at least won't be lacking in any other regard.

The Verge:

And it does raise the floor here. There's no tablet in this size range
that's as beautifully constructed, works as flawlessly, or has such an
incredible software selection. Would I prefer a higher-res display?
Certainly. Would I trade it for the app selection or hardware design?
For the consistency and smoothness of its software, or reliability of
its battery? Absolutely not. And as someone who's been living with (and
loving) Google's Nexus 7 tablet for a few months, I don't say that
lightly.

TechCrunch:

While we're on the subject of the screen, let's not beat around the
bush — if there is a weakness of this device, it's the screen. But that
statement comes with a very big asterisk. As someone who is used to a
"retina" display on my phone, tablet, and even now computer, the
downgrade to a non-retina display is quite noticeable. This goes away
over time as you use the iPad mini non-stop, but if you switch back a
retina screen, it's jarring.

Telegraph:

On the other hand, what will make some think twice about buying an iPad
mini is the price. Starting at £269 for a WiFi only model, this is £100
dearer than the Kindle Fire HD or the Nexus 7, which is now available
in a 16GB version for £159.

Whether it's worth it depends on how much of a premium you put on great
design and a vast ecosystem of apps. Apple will sell a lot of these
little beauties, that's for sure.

The Verge's video review:

CNET:

The iPad Mini is a design shift from the iPad, and perhaps the biggest
one in the iPad's entire history. Despite how popular the iPad's been,
it's not really a device that's very comfortable to use when not
sitting down or at a desk. It's a use-when-you-get-there device, or
use-when-comfortably-seated. An iPhone or iPod Touch is truly mobile,
and the iPad is only halfway there.

TIME:

Even though this screen isn't state of the art, it's O.K. If you've
ever laid your eyeballs on the ultra-smooth text rendered by the Retina
iPad, its text will look fuzzy by comparison, especially at teensier
type sizes. But the tradeoff it presents compared to the 7-inchers —
fewer pixels, but more space — is reasonable enough.

AllThingsD:

In shrinking the iconic iPad, Apple has pulled off an impressive feat.
It has managed to create a tablet that's notably thinner and lighter
than the leading small competitors with 7-inch screens, while squeezing
in a significantly roomier 7.9-inch display. And it has shunned the
plastic construction used in its smaller rivals to retain the iPad's
sturdier aluminum and glass body.

Guardian:

What will surprise you is the weight. The specs already show that the
iPad mini is lighter than the Kindle Fire, 308g v 395g (and 340g for
the Nexus 7); even if you add on a Smart Cover, it's still lighter than
the uncovered Kindle Fire. It's thinner too. This is a device that will
be ideal for holding in one hand for reading on train rides or other
commuting; or you might even forget it's in that coat pocket.

SlashGear:

Apple quotes up to 10hrs of wireless browsing over Wi-Fi for the iPad
mini, or up to 9hrs if you're using the tablet's cellular connection.
In practice, with a mixture of browsing, some video playback, games,
music – both locally-stored and streaming – and messaging, we
comfortably exceeded Apple's estimate. In fact, we exceeded 11hrs of
use before encountering a battery warning.

Fox News:

Those tablets don't have the complete experience that the iPad does.
Come on: The iPad is still the gold standard for tablet computing after
all. With stellar hardware and hundreds of thousands of apps, the iPad
is the Kleenex of facial tissue. The Tivo of DVRs. It has all the perks
of using an iOS device: AppStore, iMessages, FaceTime, etc.

Moving on to the 4th gen iPad:

TechCrunch:

If you were going to get an iPad before, obviously, you'll want to get
this one now. In fact, you don't even have a choice — Apple has
discontinued the third-generation model. The prices remain the same
across the board as do all of the other features (WiFi/LTE, Retina
display, etc).

Yes, it is kind of lame for those of us who bought third-generation
models that Apple updated the line so quickly, but well, that's Apple.
To me, the fourth-generation leap doesn't seem to be nearly as big as
the leap from the first to second generation or from the second to
third generation, so perhaps take some solace in that.

SlashGear:

The third-generation iPad arguably didn't need refreshing; in fact, if
Apple hadn't opted to change to Lightning, it could realistically have
held off changing its largest tablet until early 2013, as per its
typical yearly refresh cycle. That makes for a reasonably
straightforward upgrade decision if you're a 3rd-gen iPad owner. Unless
you're desperate for Lightning – perhaps you've also got an iPhone 5,
and want to use all the same accessories rather than buy the adapter
dongle – then we're yet to see apps that really demand the potent A6X
chipset.

The Verge:

The fourth-generation iPad is the very definition of an iterative
change: Apple made important things better, but neither overhauled nor
revolutionized anything. If the iPad's history is any indication, the
fourth-generation iPad's advantages over the third-gen model will be
most apparent two years from now, when apps are designed for the better
processor and the Lightning connector has spawned a much larger
universe of accessories. Then you'll want the extra power and the
adapter-free lifestyle.

For now, if you're within your return window you should probably swap
for the newest iPad, but if not? Rest assured you're not really missing
that much. Not yet, at least.

Telegraph:

In my testing, battery life seems to have remained the same despite the
processor, and so have the cameras. In fact, the camera is one of the
places where the impact of the A6X processor can be seen: taking
pictures is an astonishingly fast and picture quality is improved
thanks to the A6X's image signal processor.

Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to 9to5Mac using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]