Exactly. Throttle at a reasonably high GB, and the same GB
From: "Devitt devittad@comcast.net [apple-iphone]" <apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com>
To: apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2015 6:44 AM
Subject: [apple-iphone] Re: AT&T eases up on throttling
I agree. The data hogs spoil it for the average user. That said, I think the companies throttled at too low a limit to encourage those of us who have unlimited to switch to a metered choice. If I have a light month(which is common for me) they still would throttle on the very occasional heavier month.
> The issue is congestion and abuse. Cellular is very much a finite resource. You can run fibre to the home, telco buys bandwidth pipes and go for it, but while fibre joins the cell towers, congestion is very much an issue wirelessly. The purpose of unlimited is no worries, no need to check usage, just use it. But some abuse it. On the run, sweet, I'll download the internet cos I can.
> Unfortunately the few spoil it for the many. If everyone used unlimited cellular for what it is, there would be no issue. Use it don't abuse it
Sent from my iPad
> The issue is congestion and abuse. Cellular is very much a finite resource. You can run fibre to the home, telco buys bandwidth pipes and go for it, but while fibre joins the cell towers, congestion is very much an issue wirelessly. The purpose of unlimited is no worries, no need to check usage, just use it. But some abuse it. On the run, sweet, I'll download the internet cos I can.
> Unfortunately the few spoil it for the many. If everyone used unlimited cellular for what it is, there would be no issue. Use it don't abuse it
Sent from my iPad
__._,_.___
Posted by: Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (32) |
.
__,_._,___
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire