Re: [apple-iphone] New poll for apple-iphone

 

You Do know there's other Wireless Headset's out there other then Beat's that Cost Significantly Less and sound just as Good. I don't see Mophie making a case with a Aux spot for the iPhone 7, It'll be the same I'm guessing as the Current Version the of the Mophie just w/o the Aux Cord, if you're talking about Bass, I've never used factory headphones anyway and a majority of people whom do use the factory phones don't partially care much about the sound quality as they probably have a second pair anyways. I don't see Apple putting any third party maker's out of Business as the Wireless industryPicking UP!!! more…because you have many more Company's out there Besides just Beat's. I still have my 6 and didn't upgrade to the 6(S) Because well…it's sorta stupid to upgrade just because of 3D touch which you'll know will be in the next version of the iPhone, everyone's got their own bases for liking or Disliking but i don't see the Aux delete being the final decision to NOT…get it. I'm installing an Apple Car Play stereo in my Car and That Aux Cord a nuisance, but that's me…I'm just voicing my Opinion.  

On Sep 20, 2016, at 12:26 PM, rbrucecarter@yahoo.com [apple-iphone] <apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I thought I would address some of your comments.  First of all, there is a lot of legacy hardware out there.  Having spent $300 for beats, I am not about to go out and re-spend for a lightning version.  As for the adapter - have you seen how clunky it is?  Large, clunky, losable.  Same as their wireless earbugs which - I hope the people who buy them don't lose one.  That is why I am counting on Mophie to do Apple's job for them, and include the audio jack in their battery case.  The other legacy hardware I have is an FM modulator for the car.  I know a lot of people don't care about audio quality, but bluetooth isn't high quality audio.  I use the jack for the modulator to get audio into my FM radio.  Still not ideal, but in a car without an auxiliary input, it is better than bluetooth.  Thirdly, I use older iphones as test equipment.  You can get oscilloscope, frequency generator, even spectrum analyzer apps for the iphone, many of them free.  So I really need that jack!  They just deleted it for waterproofness - how come their competitors with headphone jacks are waterproof?  That excuse just doesn't fly.  Neither does the thickness excuse - the 7 is only slightly thinner than the 6, so that wasn't the real reason, either.  Digital music isn't the reason - you think battery life in an iphone is bad, try battery life in headphones with microcontrollers, D/A converters, then power amps.  They will drink battery life, unless they use Lithium Ion again, which means you will have to use a charger for your headphones.  How many chargers are people going to tolerate?  My theory - Apple wants to put third parties out of the headphone business.  They want to put out their own Beats and other quality headphones.  Well, lets see them for sale FIRST.  Or force everybody to use the really poor quality earbuds.  Newsflash - 200 Hz is not bass.  20 Hz is bass.  No earbud will ever get to 20 Hz.  That is why some of us use Beats.  Because the apple earbuds that came with the phone are poor audio quality.  I predict - really bad sales for the iPhone 7.  And that the headphone jack is the reason, and it WILL be back in future models.

  

__._,_.___

---

Posted by: Christopher Williams <chris_williams93@yahoo.com>

---

Reply via web post

•

Reply to sender

•

Reply to group

•

Start a New Topic

•

Messages in this topic (11)

---

Have you tried the highest rated email app?

With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.

---

Visit Your Group

• New Members 2

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___