>> 2. "iPod" is the name of a physical device. It has certain capabilities.
>> The iPhone is a *different* device. It has, in general, greater capabilities and flexibility.
>> It is hardly surprising that some capabilities are found categorized differently on the more flexible devise(s).
>
> I think it's very surprising, Jim. Ipod and the ipod name belong to Apple, why not use it on the iPhone? Oh yeah, they did up until the software update.
>
I guess you were NOT one of the people loudly complaining not so long ago that Apple had lumped EVERYthing under one roof, and why don't they separate music and audio under one heading, like "Music" from movies and videos under another heading, like "Video", from Apps, and from Books...?
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire