I think a significant advance in iPhone versions is up to individual thinking.
\
\ /\
( ) Alice
.( ). Sent from Retina iPad
On Sep 8, 2012, at 8:27 PM, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:
> > At the time 3G wasn't in my area and I didn't use enough video to warrant the price of upgrading to the 3G iPhone at the time
> >
> > 64gb on a cellphone doesn't interest me. 16gb is enough for me. Again, I don't do a lot of video so the video upgrade doesn't mean anything to me. I don't use bluetooth, so that doesn't mean anything. So, more satellites for GPS and higher resolution camera for stills didn't make the iPhone 4s a have to have for me.
>
> Okay, they weren't appropriate upgrades for you.
>
> That still doesn't mean that "the 3g was [not] a significant advance over the original nor the 4s over the 4".
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire