At the time 3G wasn't in my area and I didn't use enough video to
warrant the price of upgrading to the 3G iPhone at the time
64gb on a cellphone doesn't interest me. 16gb is enough for me. Again,
I don't do a lot of video so the video upgrade doesn't mean anything to
me. I don't use bluetooth, so that doesn't mean anything. So, more
satellites for GPS and higher resolution camera for stills didn't make
the iPhone 4s a have to have for me. I'm upgrading to the new one
that's being announced next week. That'll be a good upgrade for me.
\
\ /\
( ) Alice
.( ). whiterabbit32@gmail.com
On 9/8/12 6:55 PM, Jim Saklad wrote:
>
> >> The original iPhone was a huge advance over any pre-existing cell
> phone.
> >> The 3G was a significant advance over the original iPhone.
> >> The 3GS was a significant advance over the 3G.
> >> The 4 was a significant advance over the 3GS.
> >> The 4S was a significant advance over the 4.
> >> Why wouldn't the new iPhone be a significant advance over the 4S?
> >
> > I didn't think the 3g was a significant advance over the original
> nor the 4s over the 4. I waited for the 3gs and now the new one.
> > Alice
>
> 3G versus original:
> Network speed increased hugely (3G instead of 2G)
> Video 4 times the pixel density
> GPS added
>
> 4S versus 4:
> Dual-core A5 processor replaced single-core A4
> Double the storage space (64GB)
> 1080p video replaced 720p video
> Bluetooth 4.0 replaced Bluetooth 2.1
> More satellites available to the GPS
> Front and rear cameras both with higher resolution
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com <mailto:jimdoc%40me.com>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire