I suppose that sounds plausible, although the sheer scale of the difference (200 mb in three weeks) makes me dubious.
As for paying for the data used - I'm not worried on that score. Even with the much-higher AT&T figure, I'm still well within my allowable data limit. I'm just baffled as to how such a huge difference can come about.
--- In apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com, Chris Laarman <v.c.laarman@...> wrote:
>
> "RJMcW" <rjmcw@...> on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:48:50 -0000:
>
> >Every month, the AT&T figure for how much data I have used is significantly greater than the iPhone figure.
>
> There may be a difference between "bytes transfered" (AT&T) and "bytes
> received" (iPhone).
>
> That difference could (among other causes I can imagine) be due to
> poor connections (iPhone: "Could you please resend that block of
> bytes?").
>
> If so, then we could discuss who'd have to pay for such losses - but
> the outcome would definitely be: you (one way or another).
>
> --
> Chris Laarman
>
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire