They have not made a decision if they will appeal. So it does not look like the $850 has been given. Also. I am not sure I saw that throttling would stop.
On Feb 24, 2012, at 10:43 PM, "" <kelly@nikonkelly.com> wrote:
> This is exactly what I expected to happen. Right from the start
> of this, I said that unlimited was to be unlimited no
> throttleing, no caps, no nothing now, I have to wonder, will
> ATT learn from this or will the rest of us have to do the same
> thing.
> Kelly Todd
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brent
> To: Apple-iPhone Group
> Cc: Brent
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 6:22 PM
> Subject: [apple-iphone] iPhone user successfully sues AT&T over
> 3G throttling
>
>
>
> http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/12/02/24/iphone_user_successfully_sues_att_over_3g_throttling.html
>
> Sent to you by Brent via Google Reader: iPhone user successfully
> sues
> AT&T over 3G throttling via AppleInsider on 2/24/12
> In a California court ruling on Friday, an AT&T customer who saw
> a
> reduction in his iPhone's download speed due to high usage, was
> awarded
> $850 on claims that the telecom's throttling measures are unfair
> to
> consumers.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire