Thanks for adding that. You pretty much got the point there.
By the way, there are also model numbers which are rather complex and only vendors usually use them.
Archie
On Jun 28, 2012, at 18:39, Roger Prokic <rprokic@me.com> wrote:
> They did not call iPods by generation at all. You needed to know the generation for warranty or accessories. But Apple never call them anything other than iPod. Same with Macs. The year built was for warranty or parts. It's not the same as calling the iPhone the iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPhone 4S.
>
> It really makes sense to call it just the iPhone. Just like the new MacBook Air or MacBook Pro just introduced have no other designation with the product name.
>
> Roger
>
> ---
> Roger Prokic
>
> -=[ this message was sent from my Apple iPhone 4S with iOS 6.0 beta 2 ]=-
>
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 11:44 PM, Archie C Grapa <archiegrapa@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > It wasn't a PITA with the iPods and the MacBooks. They call it 4th (or whatever) generation iPod. And my MacBook Pro is the 15" early 2011 model. No 1, 2, SSD, 3S, or any similar nomenclature. Although I agree that numbering would be easier for people. But apple is not actually naming the iPhones using numbers. Only the iPhone 4 has been named using its number in order of generation. So, if people are to refer to the upcoming iPhone using numbers, iPhone 6 would be more logical, not 5. But Apple will surprise everyone again.
> >
> > Archie
> >
> > On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:32, "N.A. Nada" <whodo678@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Because it is a PITA to figure out which model people are talking about when the names are all the same for a product line.
> >>
> >> And what happens when the next model comes along or the one after that are they going to call it, the "next new iPad" and the "one following the next new iPad"? It is a heck of a lot easier to just call it the iPad 3.
> >>
> >> Not to mention that when the next model comes out, the iPad 3 will not be the new iPad.
> >>
> >> Brent
> >>
> >> On Jun 27, 2012, at 2:36 PM, someone wrote:
> >>
> >> I agree, Roger. iPods are not numbered so why any of Apples devices?
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire