I know I have limited bandwidth. It's what I signed up for. My complaint isn't with limited use. It's with "unlimited" contracts. The telcos are abuse of "unlimited". Unlimited means no limits. Throttling is limiting. I don't see the telcos ever changing, just the dictionary.
\
\
\ /\
( ) Alice
.( ). lwr32@mac.com
On May 9, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brent whodo678@yahoo.com [apple-iphone] <apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
What we want and what the contract we sign have no relationship to the other.I never said AT&T, but I would still bet you don't have a copy of your contract with your current carrier, and that is what counts, if you want to argue with your carrier. Not your wishes.BrentOn May 9, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Alice Saunders lwr32@mac.com [apple-iphone] wrote:No I don't have a copy of the AT&T contract anymore. I'm with VZ now. I have never felt throttling was fair because we all pay the same amount that we signed up to pay every month. When the cell company throttles, shouldn't we pay less during that time? Of course cell companies won't go for it.
On May 8, 2015, at 6:35 AM, Brent whodo678@yahoo.com [apple-iphone] <apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Alice, where does it say they will provide unthrottled service? They don't even guarantee the speed of service.I'll bet you a dollar to a stale donut you don't even have a copy if the contract.
BrentSent from my iPhone, please excuse any brevity.
On May 8, 2015, at 12:19 AM, Alice Saunders lwr32@mac.com [apple-iphone] <apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Still not good. We pay for non-throttled service, so we should get it.
__._,_.___
Posted by: Alice Saunders <lwr32@mac.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (21) |
.
__,_._,___
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire