Another thought on the same lines. If you plan on only 2 sizes and want the smaller to be acceptable to people who prefer the previous size, you would pitch the 6 a bit smaller at 4.3" or 4.5" (or even 4"). 4.7" is halfway between 4 and 5.5 so I think Apple has left room to bring in a 4" 6 (or 6s) "Mini" at some point, and this probably depends on how sales of the 5c and 5s go in comparison to the 6.
Otto
On 11 September 2014 20:18, Tony tdale@xtra.co.nz [apple-iphone] <apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I feel thry thought about what is the largest size that the 4" users will accept, and they chose 4.7. My 5S, my thumb can reach the opposite top apps, anything more is a stretch, so it may not be too much of a drama, and more ideal for viewing apps. They may keep the 5S for a good while, and possible upgrade the 5S and call it a 7L for lite, in order to keep the 4" current-ish. And see what sales go like
__._,_.___
Posted by: Otto Nikolaus <otto.nikolaus@googlemail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (21) |
.
__,_._,___
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire