I feel thry thought about what is the largest size that the 4" users will accept, and they chose 4.7. My 5S, my thumb can reach the opposite top apps, anything more is a stretch, so it may not be too much of a drama, and more ideal for viewing apps. They may keep the 5S for a good while, and possible upgrade the 5S and call it a 7L for lite, in order to keep the 4" current-ish. And see what sales go like
From: "dskolnick@gmail.com [apple-iphone]" <apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com>
To: apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 3:28 AM
Subject: Re: [apple-iphone] Re: iPhone 6 launch
To: apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 3:28 AM
Subject: Re: [apple-iphone] Re: iPhone 6 launch
---In apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com, <macsonly@...> wrote :
On 9/11/14 5:35 AM, Otto Nikolaus otto.nikolaus@... [apple-iphone] wrote:
It could be that the 6 is *just* small enough, and I'd guess that Apple has thought hard about its size.That doesn't mean they got it right. They could easily have gotten caught up in the angst on size driven by Samsung without regard for the many of us that bought phones that were NOT too big.
I'm taking bets on the iPhone 7 being smaller.
dave
__._,_.___
Posted by: Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (19) |
.
__,_._,___
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire