On Oct 25, 2012, at 10:27 PM, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:
>> I'm disappointed in the iPad mini. Why did they leave off the retina display and price it so high? I can see paying $349 if it were retina but since its not, I can't justify the price since I have an iPad 3.
>> White Rabbit
>
>
> It costs $170 less than the iPad 2 did when it was released, and has the same pixel resolution, faster connectivity, and (I think) better cameras.
>
> What's not to like?
Since the iPad Mini is smaller that the iPad wouldn't the pixels per inch be approaching the same number?
How about one of you mathematicians crunch this for us.
Robert Poland - Fort Collins, CO
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (32) |
.
__,_._,___
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire