On 11 June 2012 21:46, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:
>
> Okay.
>
> Case 1 -- your way.
> You stop playing something. The hated "selection" is de-selected.
> Later you want to play something.
> You go back into playlists, or artists, or songs, search or scroll until
> you find YOUR CHOICE (even if it's the SAME choice), and tap to play.
>
> Case 2 -- Apple's way.
> You stop playing something. The "selection" remains selected.
> Later you want to play something.
> You go back into playlists, or artists, or songs, search or scroll until
> you find YOUR CHOICE (unless it's the SAME choice, which is still selected)
> and tap to play.
>
> I fail to see how your method is easier, quicker, or better in any way
> than Apple's method. In fact, if you choose to play something different,
> Apple's method IS your method.
>
> No one is forcing you here.
>
I agree. I can see *no disadvantage whatsoever* in a track/podcast
remaining selected until it finishes or I want to select a different one.
What is the value of having *nothing* selected?
Otto
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire